点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
青海西宁：物流“春节不打烊”“税关怀”让包裹不“迟到”******
(新春走基层) 青海西宁：物流“春节不打烊”“税关怀”让包裹不“迟到”
中新网西宁1月18日电 题：青海西宁：物流“春节不打烊”“税关怀”让包裹不“迟到”
作者李隽杜亚萍
腊月二十七，清晨的第一缕阳光映照着高原大地的红灯龙门，折射出浓浓年味。
位于西宁市火车站附近的中国邮政西宁邮件处理中心一派繁忙，分拣机器正在高速旋转，工作人员将分拣好的包裹有序装车，再由配送小哥送达各个地方。
在堆积满柜的包裹中，快递小哥刘少华拿着手中的扫码机，熟练地挑拣、录入着上午需要派送的快递，再整整齐齐地放进快递三轮车里，这是他的工作日常。
“每天派送3次，一共派送200多件快递，也不觉得累，一天下来很充实。”刘少华说。谈到新年愿望，他说：“今年不回家过年了，打算在这边过个年，希望在2023年我可以通过自己的努力工作，让大家的每一件包裹都不‘迟到’。”
今年春节，中国邮政速递物流有限公司服务不“打烊”，工人们轮班工作，保障群众的便利生活。国家税务总局西宁市税务局也将落实好各项税费支持政策，为企业发展保驾护航。
“2022年，我们公司享受减税降费及各项税收优惠159.82万元，增值税留抵退税252.62万元，节省下来的资金我们可以用在设备更新、生产、人力成本等方面，使企业进一步做大做强，进一步提升为民服务的能力。”中国邮政西宁邮件处理中心业务主管董向军说。
位于湟中区的西宁海都中通速递服务公司派送中心同样繁忙。网管经理李炳青告诉记者，去年12月上旬是最艰难的，在“减员增件”的情况下，为数不多在岗的快递工人每天都要工作到凌晨。
图为税务干部为外卖小哥为送政策送祝福。 张晓昕 摄几年虽然已近年关，快递工人却比平时更加忙碌。为了让民众都能早日收到快递，西宁海都中通速递服务公司也推出“春节不打烊”服务，保障民众生活需要。为帮助企业及时享受税惠政策红利，西宁市税务局采取“全覆盖宣传、个性化辅导、网格化服务”相结合的方式，税务干部实地走访和“云端”连线并行，为纳税人宣传税惠政策，了解企业需求，辅导纳税人办理各类业务。
“税务部门服务很贴心，每逢新政策工作人员都会打电话通知、辅导，电子税务局办税也很方便，我们觉得特别有温度，2022年我们减免的17万元也将用于扩大经营规模，购买、维护设备，发放加班工资补贴等，帮助我们更好服务市民朋友。”西宁海都中通速递服务公司财务袁俊霞说。
在青海佑海网络科技有限公司，外卖小哥整装待发，做好接单准备。“平均每天接70到80单，早晨7点就开始上班了，直到晚上11点换班。”外卖小哥马明海告诉记者：“春节期间我们也是继续上班，为大家送去美味和便利，确保大家过个好年。”
自2019年以来，西宁税务在每年税收宣传月都会与美团配送签约开展“税收优惠政策美团为您配送”主题宣传活动，结合外卖小哥接触面广、投递灵活的特点和“送啥都快”的优势，让他们将税惠政策送到千家万户，这已成为西宁街头的靓丽风景。与此同时，税惠减免和便民服务也为加盟企业带去支持。
“2022年，我们公司享受各项税惠减免49万余元，这些钱在疫情防控期间不仅改善了我们的员工食宿，也给‘小哥’们买了防疫物资及药品，保障他们的健康，确保更好地为广大市民服务。”美团莫家街站点负责人阿龙说。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)